Sometimes old errors are caused by different reasons than
what originally caused them. Case in
point, I was working on a batch and MaxL script to automate an Essbase Studio
deploy command in 11.1.2.3.5X. I ran the
script and got an Error message “Essmsh
exe has stopped working” and the batch file crashed. Thinking I did nothing wrong, I googled the
error message and got multiple references to a document statin this was a bug
and to use the 32 bit version of MaxL instead of the 4 bit version.
This would have been fine except for the fact that I had
other deploy commands working fine using the same Essmsh command. In addition,
the document was for 11.1.2.1 and was fixed in 11.1.2.2. I went
around and around, changing dimension order as I remembered I had issues in the
past with the accounts dimension being first. Nothing I did to the script or
the outline mattered.
I spent way too much on this and was getting very
frustrated. The process actually did produce a log which I finally looked at
and found
Caused by: Cannot end incremental
build. Essbase Error(1060053): Outline has errors\\Outline verification errors:
\\Member Income Stmt Calc has no
value source. Aggregate storage outlines
require non level-0 members in accounts dimension to be either non-stored
members or have internal/external formula.
\\Member REPORTING_STATS has no value
source. Aggregate storage outlines
require non level-0 members in accounts dimension to be either non-stored
members or have internal/external formula.
\\Member MISC has no value
source. Aggregate storage outlines
require non level-0 members in accounts dimension to be either non-stored
members or have internal/external formula.
Hmm, So I went back into the Essbase Model properties and lo
and behold the setting for data storage was set to use existing. I do have a column in my data source for
storage type which I forgot to set as an external source. I reran and it worked
like a charm. This made sense as I had
set the accounts dimension to rebuild. The accounts would have all been deleted
and not re-added properly.
The Moral of the story is twofold. First, When you have an
issue don’t assume you did everything right the first time (I didn’t) and
second, don’t assume that what you read on google for older versions is going
to solve your issue.
1 comment:
yes
and I have 3-d mentions
push Oracle to link right errors
Post a Comment